tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post5455575833345794264..comments2023-11-03T03:52:37.873-05:00Comments on Cognitive Dissidence: Walkergate: All Eyes Turn To Tim RussellSomebody DO Something!http://www.blogger.com/profile/08717747685928127724noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-16237096690173597032012-11-24T14:02:46.415-06:002012-11-24T14:02:46.415-06:00You can't find that because it's not germa...You can't find that because it's not germane to the case against Russell.<br /><br />And again, the DA has him on the list to confirm that he transferred control of the funds to Russell. That's all.capperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08751967312821403092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-5290201087464869372012-11-24T11:54:11.685-06:002012-11-24T11:54:11.685-06:00Is he on the list as a witness for the prosecution...Is he on the list as a witness for the prosecution or for the defense?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-48348526897904377212012-11-24T11:53:20.841-06:002012-11-24T11:53:20.841-06:00Capper,
I haven't read anything that shows th...Capper,<br /><br />I haven't read anything that shows that Walker knew that Russell was using the charity to fund his campaign and leisure related activities. I have read that Walker knew specificly direct Russell to manage the funds and that Walker knew the funds were being used for the "charity" event at the zoo (which we can probably agree served to also "embiggen" Walker), but I haven't been able to find any evidence that Walker knew Russell was stealing the money from the account to fund his trip to kiss Herman Cain's ring. <br /><br />Thoughts?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-39890777821168095032012-11-24T08:50:26.518-06:002012-11-24T08:50:26.518-06:00Yup, but supposedly only to confirm that he person...Yup, but supposedly only to confirm that he personally directed the veterans fund to be transferred to Russell's control.capperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08751967312821403092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-38008164142497177362012-11-24T08:48:37.417-06:002012-11-24T08:48:37.417-06:00Is Walker on the witness list for Russell's tr...Is Walker on the witness list for Russell's trial?davnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-16883133521960845422012-11-22T22:55:47.061-06:002012-11-22T22:55:47.061-06:00Aside from the criminal charges that the Walkergat...Aside from the criminal charges that the Walkergate Wankers face and/or are pleading guilty to, it seems that maintaining Wingnut Welfare eligibility is an extremely important consideration. For those not sentenced to long prison terms, the future may be mostly sunny thanks to Wingnut Welfare. But are there clouds of doubt on that horizon? <br /><br />Are there any limits to Wingnut Welfare? Is it an entitlement which once earned must be delivered no matter what; or is it at risk in case of certain high crimes and misdemeanors?<br /><br />It is possible that nothing is too toxic or extreme. Reference, Todd Akin, Rush Limbaugh and Gordon Liddy. For the distaff wingnuts: Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEHJSoNEyPw" rel="nofollow"> Sharron Angle</a>. (Of these six only <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/todd-akin-arrested-may-9-1987-radical-anti-abortion-group" rel="nofollow"> Todd Akin</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005147/bio" rel="nofollow">Gordon Liddy</a> were ever arrested for their extremism.)<br /><br /><br />On the other hand, is it possible that convictions for the types of <a href="http://www.wisdems.org/case-files/brian-pierick" rel="nofollow"> charges that Brian Pierick is facing</a>:<br /><br /><i> Charges: One felony count of child enticement (exposing sex organ), a Class D felony punishable by fines of up to $100,000 and/or imprisonment of up to 25 years. One felony count of exposing genitals or pubic area, a Class I Felony, punishable by fines of up to $10,000 and/or imprisonment of up to 3.5 years. </i> <br /><br />might exclude him from receiving his accrued and vested Wingnut Welfare benefits?<br /><br />If this is the case then might the taint extend to Scott Russell and then endanger his accrued and vested Wingnut Welfare benefits?<br /><br /> Even assuming no additional charges are filed against Russell, any convictions of Pierick might add credence to the <a href="http://wispolitics.com/1006/large/120105_State_v_Pierick.pdf" rel="nofollow"> State's allegations of Russell's propinquity and participation</a> in various events far outside the facade of acceptable Republican Wingnut behavior.<br /><br />Will any of the other various players in Walkergate find they are on a slippery slope with respect to their Wingnut Welfare entitlement? <br /> <br />Or does following Saint Ronald's 11th Commandment guarantee that the Walkergate perps and convicts will receive their Wingnut Welfare benefits, no matter how toxic and reprehensible their actual convictions and behavior?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888314760091661875.post-69233222986418893992012-11-22T22:15:48.045-06:002012-11-22T22:15:48.045-06:00This is a judicial chessmatch if there ever was on...This is a judicial chessmatch if there ever was one.Aaron Camphttp://bluedownstate.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.com