The Walkersha (Not so)Freeman, like so many other papers, have put their online edition behind a paywall. And like so many other papers, they don't have anything worth paying for.
But that's not the point. The point is, when one goes to their site as a non-subscriber, you see this:
Please note the name they use in the sample box: John Doe!
It's rather ironic that the paper that wouldn't cover the investigation would be willing to give John Doe a subscription, don't you think?